tinsoldier

Members
  • Content count

    92
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tinsoldier


  1. On 5/3/2024 at 11:38 AM, DanP said:

    I was not sure where to post this, or is even relevant to the JSAR community?

    I am thinking there was no relation to the JSAR or to Col. Melvin Johnson.

    Looking for any information on some documents I came across.

    Johnson Automatic Carbine Type S55/3-1, Cal..30 CARB.- Prototype by Lt. Col James H. Johnson. Circa 1968

    It looks similar to a "Feather Industries" AT-9, but in .30 carbine. And was pitched to the government  with a submachine gun version

    Is it possible to scan the documents and upload them here?  I've gotten nowhere trying to research based on your post.


  2. 59 minutes ago, M48TANKER said:

    It's possibly the "Star of David" mark of Israel. You may have to do some research to even get an inkling of that chapter of Lyndon Johnson's dealings with Israel.

     

    Thanks M48TANKER, I suppose it's possible, although it doesn't look like the stampings on my 2 Israeli Mauser bayonets... I will definitely try to research that.  


  3. 14 hours ago, matconcrete said:

    I love it, B3222 is another USMC rifle but family did not want to release paper work! I am sure some of these were USMC used but when in very nice condition? Always makes me suspicious.

    I know of this seller, as he is local in my area.  Caveat Emptor would be an understatement for some of what he comes up with. 


  4. 16 hours ago, ArtR said:

    Boy, that's a new on on me.

    Thanks for replying Art... I actually had taken the rifle all apart over a year ago, and cleaned it without noticing this.  At 64, my eyes aren't as sharp as they used to be.  I just thought it was a 'ding' until I went to put a sling on it the other day.   


  5. 32 minutes ago, Rarecat said:

    Unfortunately I too would recommend not placing any hope of Murrays delivering.  A friend of mine sent a receiver and trigger group at their request.  A year went by and my friend finally got his JSAR parts back but not stock.  The story was (at that time) that the Murray guy needed someone to bore the spring tube correctly and he couldn't do it.  

    We have the same friend.:D


  6. 1 hour ago, camstuff said:

    I remember some people having issues with Murray.  I would advise doing some search’s for Murry or Murray’s stocks just to read up on what you might encounter. 

    Yes, this is true - I got an NRA sporter stock from him that I was not happy with.  A good friend sent him some JSAR samples and metal with the intent of Murray producing repro wood.  Much time elapsed before Murray returned the samples stating that it couldn't be done.


  7. 51 minutes ago, RWWJ said:

    Hi TinSoldier

    Thank you for you input and feed back also, i have not figured out how to reply to an individual post yet so will keep trying, meantime you you mind sharing what a IMO Buttstock is please ?

    many thanks 

    Richard 

    PS i have just discovered that if i hide my location behind a VPN i can view the Numrich website so happy days i will see if i can find my missing parts on there :-)

     

    IMO = In my opinion.  It's just part of the jargon we yanks use.:lol:


  8. B3601 is described by seller as "correct, excellent, and rare".  Appears to be missing the front sight pins, forearm has no cutout for the front cross pin.  Buttplate doesn't fit well.   The member here who owned it states that it had a ramp front sight and no bayonet lug, and appeared to be reparked, back in 2005.  Seller claims wood is all original, "been together for 80 years".  Metal finish "all original". Hmmmmmm....


  9. 11 hours ago, RWWJ said:

    Hi Phil and Tin Soldier 

    Thank you very much for the advice and feed back, i am about to head away for a week however when i get back i am looking forward to stripping her down and checking everything out so i will get some photos of the serial numbers and get back to you all asap. Its great to have a new addition to the family(so to speak) in which the parts can be so well identified and verified, greatly appreciated 

    Cheers

    Richard    

    That's the nice thing about having a non-prefix rifle, ArtR can tell you what's what as to originality, as matconcrete said.

    The letter prefix guns are anybody's guess at the moment.  Anyway, welcome aboard!


  10. Looks like a nice old war horse that saw some use for it's intended purpose.  Buttstock is a replacement, IMO.  You're missing the front cross pin, and the retaining clip that's pinned to the forend, not uncommon for a battle rifle.  Currently, there's a pin listed on ebay for $24.95

    20240324_170231.jpg


  11. 2 hours ago, dawg180 said:

    Got the barrel today, it is an actual Johnson barrel with matching serial number on the barrel and barrel extension and the "JA 30-06" near the breech end.

    It either was welded up super proferssionally, or possibly turned down at the muzzle end (slight taper) to remove the pin marks, or I guess it could have been a factory barrel with no front sight or bayonet lug ever installed, so I will have to measure it to see what diameter it is near the muzzle.

     

    If you can dig up the muzzle diameter on a factory barrel that would be great, otherwise a friend of mine has a 1941 Johnson that I can measure the outside diameter of the barrel to compare.

    I'm getting a micrometer reading on one of mine at .562" at the muzzle.  .590" just in front of the bayonet lug.  If that helps any.